资本主义和平

资本主义和平（英文: Capitalist Peace）又称资本主义和平论（英文: Capitalist Peace Theory）、商业和平（英文: Commercial Peace）和商业自由主义（英文: Commercial Liberalism）。该理论认为市场开放有助于建构国家之间更和平的关系，原因是发达的市场导向型经济体不太可能相互冲突^[1]。与民主和平论和制度主义的和平论证一起，商业和平构成了康德和平三脚架的一部分^[2]。商业和平的重要机制围绕着资本主义、贸易相互依存和资本相互依存如何提高战争成本的相关观点，这些观点宣称商业自由主义游说团体会说服公众反对战争，使领导人更难发动战争，并且减少征战所带来的经济利益^[3]。

学术界一直在争论商业和平论的证据和理据的有效性，以及该理论背后的机制^[4]^[5]^[6]。根据埃里克·加茨克（Erik Gartzke）和张佳坤（Jiakun Jack Zhang）所提出的说法，关于经济相互依存与冲突之间关系的证据尚无定论^[7]。

参考资料

^ Mansfield, Edward D. Pevehouse, Jon C. W; Seabrooke, Leonard , 编. International Trade and Conflict. The Oxford Handbook of International Political Economy. 2021. ISBN 978-0-19-879351-9. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198793519.013.27. （原始内容存档于2021-05-15）（英语）.
^ Russett, Bruce; Oneal, John R.; Davis, David R. The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950-85. International Organization. 1998, 52 (3): 441–467 [2023-07-09]. ISSN 0020-8183. JSTOR 2601398. S2CID 153665709. doi:10.1162/002081898550626. （原始内容存档于2022-01-10）.
^ Poast, Paul. Beyond the "Sinew of War": The Political Economy of Security as a Subfield. Annual Review of Political Science. 2019, 22 (1): 223–239. ISSN 1094-2939. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070912  （英语）.
^ Mousseau, Michael. The End of War: How a Robust Marketplace and Liberal Hegemony Are Leading to Perpetual World Peace. International Security. 2019, 44 (1): 160–196. ISSN 0162-2889. S2CID 198952369. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00352.
^ Copeland, Dale C. Economic Interdependence and War. Princeton University Press. 2015: 1–25 [2023-07-09]. ISBN 978-0-691-16159-4. JSTOR j.ctt7ztkw2. （原始内容存档于2022-11-15）.
^ Farrell, Henry; Newman, Abraham L. Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion. International Security. 2019-07-01, 44 (1): 42–79. ISSN 0162-2889. S2CID 198952367. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00351 .
^ Gartzke, Erik; Zhang, Jiakun Jack. Trade and War. The Oxford Handbook of the Political Economy of International Trade. 2015. ISBN 978-0-19-998175-5. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199981755.013.27. （原始内容存档于2016-05-21）（英语）.

外部链接

[1] Mansfield, Edward D. Pevehouse, Jon C. W; Seabrooke, Leonard , 编. International Trade and Conflict. The Oxford Handbook of International Political Economy. 2021. ISBN 978-0-19-879351-9. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198793519.013.27. （原始内容存档于2021-05-15）（英语）.

[:4-2] Russett, Bruce; Oneal, John R.; Davis, David R. The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950-85. International Organization. 1998, 52 (3): 441–467 [2023-07-09]. ISSN 0020-8183. JSTOR 2601398. S2CID 153665709. doi:10.1162/002081898550626. （原始内容存档于2022-01-10）.

[3] Poast, Paul. Beyond the "Sinew of War": The Political Economy of Security as a Subfield. Annual Review of Political Science. 2019, 22 (1): 223–239. ISSN 1094-2939. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070912  （英语）.

[:0-4] Mousseau, Michael. The End of War: How a Robust Marketplace and Liberal Hegemony Are Leading to Perpetual World Peace. International Security. 2019, 44 (1): 160–196. ISSN 0162-2889. S2CID 198952369. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00352.

[:3-5] Copeland, Dale C. Economic Interdependence and War. Princeton University Press. 2015: 1–25 [2023-07-09]. ISBN 978-0-691-16159-4. JSTOR j.ctt7ztkw2. （原始内容存档于2022-11-15）.

[:8-6] Farrell, Henry; Newman, Abraham L. Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion. International Security. 2019-07-01, 44 (1): 42–79. ISSN 0162-2889. S2CID 198952367. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00351 .

[7] Gartzke, Erik; Zhang, Jiakun Jack. Trade and War. The Oxford Handbook of the Political Economy of International Trade. 2015. ISBN 978-0-19-998175-5. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199981755.013.27. （原始内容存档于2016-05-21）（英语）.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]