跳转到内容

美国共和党派系

本页使用了标题或全文手工转换
维基百科,自由的百科全书
美国共和党标志

美国共和党包括多个政治派系。19世纪,美国共和党的派系包括:混血派英语Half-Breeds (politics),他们支持进行公务员制度改革;激进派,他们支持废除美国的奴隶制度,后来又在重建时期倡导给予被解放奴隶平等的公民权死忠派英语Stalwarts (politics),他们支持机械政治英语Political machine。进入20世纪后,共和党的派系分化为进步派(Progressive Republicans)、里根派英语Reagan coalition洛克菲勒派。而在21世纪,美国共和党的派系主要由保守派(在国会以共和党研究委员会自由核心小组为代表)、温和派(在国会以共和党治理集团英语Republican Governance Group问题解决者核心小组英语Problem Solvers Caucus中的共和党员为代表)和自由派(在国会以共和党自由核心小组英语Republican Liberty Caucus为代表)组成。在唐纳德·特朗普担任美国总统期间,共和党又分裂出特朗普派反特朗普派英语Never Trump movement

现有主要派系

[编辑]
第45任及第47任美国总统唐纳德·特朗普

巴拉克·奥巴马担任美国总统期间,美国共和党经历了一场其统治阶级(即共和党建制派)与信奉反建制小政府主义茶党运动之间的内讧。[1][2][3][4] 2012年,《纽约时报》将共和党划分为六个派系:大街选民派(Main Street Voters)、茶党选民派(Tea Party Voters)、基督教保守派(Christian Conservatives)、自由派(Libertarians)、不满派(The Disaffected)和濒危 / 消失派(Endangered / Vanished)。[5] 2014年,皮尤研究中心将倾向于共和党的选民分为三个派系:坚定保守派(Steadfast Conservatives)、商业保守派(Business Conservatives)和年轻局外派(Young Outsiders)。[6] 2019年,在唐纳德·特朗普担任美国总统期间,538网的小佩利·培根(Perry Bacon Jr.)断言共和党将分类成五个派系:特朗普派、支持特朗普派、对特朗普持怀疑态度的保守派、对特朗普持怀疑态度的温和派和反特朗普派。[7]

2021年2月,在唐纳德·特朗普败选给乔·拜登国会山骚乱之后,《华盛顿邮报》的菲利普·邦普(Philip Bump)认为当时的共和党众议员已经分裂成特朗普派(该派系反对第二次弹劾特朗普和剥夺玛乔丽·泰勒·格林自由核心小组成员资格及推翻2020年总统选举结果)、问责核心小组派(该派系支持第二次弹劾特朗普和 / 或剥夺玛乔丽·泰勒·格林自由核心小组成员资格)和亲民主共和党人派(该派系既反对第二次弹劾特朗普和剥夺玛乔丽·泰勒·格林自由核心小组成员资格但也反对推翻2020年总统选举结果)。[8] 同一时期,《达拉斯晨报英语The Dallas Morning News》的卡尔·洛布斯多夫(Carl Leubsdorf)也认定共和党人分为三种类别:从不支持特朗普派(包括比尔·克里斯托、参议员米特·罗姆尼及州长查利·贝克拉里·霍甘等)、有时支持特朗普派(包括参议院少数党领袖米奇·麦康奈尔常驻联合国代表妮基·黑利等)、始终支持特朗普派(包括参议员泰德·克鲁兹乔希·霍利等)。[9]

2021年3月,根据一份民意调查报告显示,在特朗普当选总统后,支持共和党的选民中分化出五个派系:永绝特朗普派、后特朗普派(喜欢特朗普但不希望他再次参选)、支持特朗普派(喜欢特朗普但更认同共和党而非特朗普本人)、特朗普死忠派和共和党信息战派(认同阴谋论者)。[10] 同年11月,皮尤研究中心的一份调查显示有四类美国人群会与共和党结盟,他们分别是:信仰与旗帜保守派(Faith and Flag Conservatives)、坚定保守派(Committed Conservatives)、民粹右派(Populist Right)和矛盾右派(Ambivalent Right)。[11][12]

截至2023年,国会共和党议员将众议院内的共和党派系称为“五大家族”。[13][14][15][16] “五大家族”的概念源自电影《教父》,特指美国黑手党犯罪家族。[14]美国众议院内的共和党“五大家族”指的是代表众议院右翼的自由核心小组、代表保守派的共和党研究委员会、代表商人利益的主街核心小组(Main Street Caucus)、代表主流共和党人的共和党治理集团英语Republican Governance Group以及跨党派问题解决者核心小组英语Problem Solvers Caucus中的共和党议员。需要注意的是,这些派系中的成员相互重叠。[15]

特朗普派

[编辑]
美國副總統万斯
JD·万斯
(候任美國副總統)
前眾議員加巴德
圖爾西·加巴德
(前聯邦眾議員)
美國駐聯合國大使斯蒂芬尼克
埃莉斯·斯蒂芬尼克
(候任美國駐聯合國大使)
聯邦眾議員蓋茨
馬特·蓋茨
(聯邦眾議員)
聯邦眾議員博伯特
劳伦·博伯特
(聯邦眾議員)
聯邦參議員霍利
乔希·霍利
(聯邦參議員)

特朗普派(有時被稱為MAGA或「美國優先」運動)[17][18]是截至2024年,共和黨當今的主要派系。[19][20][21][22][23]它被描述為由一系列右翼意識形態組成,包括但不限於右翼民粹主義[24][25][26]民族保守主義[27]新民族主義[28]、和與唐納德·川普及其支持者有關的政治運動。[29][30]有一些評論家將他們描述為美國政治上的「極右派」。[31][32][33]

國際關係中,川普主義者支持美國援助以色列,但不支持烏克蘭[34][35],普遍支持俄羅斯[36][37],並支持孤立主義的「美國優先」外交政策議程。[38][39][40][41]他們普遍拒絕黨內和與民主黨的妥協[42][43],並願意驅逐他們認為過於溫和的共和黨官員。[44][45]與其他共和黨人相比,川普派更有可能是移民限制主義者[46],並且反對自由貿易[47]新保守主義[48]环境保护主义[49]

共和黨的川普主義隨著2010年代2020年代全球極右運動的增加而出現[50][51],也被描述為「極右派」的茶黨運動崛起亦推動了川普主義。[52] 2016年總統選舉川普首次當選美國總統後,該黨主要分裂為支持川普和反對川普兩派。[53][54]川普在2020年連任敗選和在2024年再次勝選後,特朗普派在共和黨中已越來越占主導地位。

保守派

[编辑]
2010年美国各州自认保守派人士占总人口比例:[55]
  49%及以上
  45–48%
  41–44%
  37–40%
  33–36%
  32%及以下

美国现代保守主义诞生于1950年代到1960年代之间,最初的领导人包括共和党参议员罗伯特·塔夫脱罗素·柯克小威廉·巴克利等人。其核心宗旨包括促进个人自由和自由市场经济,同时反对工会高税负政府监管[56]

在经济政策方面,保守派呼吁大幅度削减政府开支英语Government spending、减少对经济的监管以及改变或私有化社会保障供给面学派新自由主义的支持者占据着主流地位,但是财政保守主义赤字鹰派英语Deficit hawk贸易保护主义英语Protectionism in the United States等思潮在共和党内也不乏支持者。1930年之前,共和党内东北部支持制造业的派系曾坚定要求提高关税;而在唐纳德·特朗普担任美国总统期间,这一立场在许多保守派圈子内又重新流行起来。[57][58] 保守派通常持社会保守主义立场,他们支持持枪权限制堕胎权;但是这些问题在共和党内有诸多观点。[59]

保守派普遍反对平权运动,但支持增大军费开支和反对控枪。而在学券议题上,共和党保守派分裂成了两个阵营。支持者相信“大政府教育是失败的”;而反对者则担心政府趁机加强对私立学校和教会学校的控制。部分共和党保守派因为反环保主义否认气候变化而否定普遍科学共识[60][61][62][63][64][65] 这使得他们遭致批评;并且他们的这种行为在全球保守派政党中也独树一帜。[65]

在特朗普当选总统后,保守派思想的长期转变被描述为传统保守主义意识形态与右翼民粹主义主题相结合的“新融合主义英语Fusionism”。[66] 这些转变导致保守派越来越倾向民族保守主义贸易保护主义文化保守主义,支持更现实的外交政策和对新保守主义的否定,同时减少回滚权利计划的努力以及对传统制衡的蔑视。[66][67][68]

基督教右派

[编辑]

自由意志派

[编辑]
參議員蘭德·保羅
蘭德·保羅
(联邦參議員)
參議員麥克·李
麥克·李
(联邦參議員)

新保守派

[编辑]

温和派

[编辑]
前聯邦參議員麥凱恩
約翰·麥凱恩
(前聯邦參議員)
聯邦參議員麗莎·穆爾科斯基
麗莎·穆爾科斯基
(聯邦參議員)
聯邦參議員柯琳絲
蘇珊·柯琳絲
(聯邦參議員)
內華達州州長隆巴多
喬·隆巴多
(現任內華達州州長)

反特朗普派

[编辑]

国会核心小组

[编辑]
选举年 共和党研究委员会 共和党治理集团英语Republican Governance Group 自由核心小组
2020年
157 / 213
45 / 213
45 / 213
2022年
156 / 222
42 / 222
46 / 222

重要历史派系

[编辑]

相关条目

[编辑]

参考资料

[编辑]
  1. ^ Republicans and Tea Party Activists in 'Full Scale Civil War'. ABC新闻. 2013-12-13 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2023-12-06). 
  2. ^ Don Gonyea. GOP Establishment Grapples With A Tea Party That Won't Budge. 全国公共广播电台. 2013-10-02 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2015-09-14). 
  3. ^ Alan I. Abramowitz. Not Their Cup of Tea: The Republican Establishment versus the Tea Party. Center for Politics. 2013-11-14 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2013-11-16). 
  4. ^ Establishment Vs. Tea Party in Primary Showdowns. CBS新闻. 2010-09-14 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2022-01-17). 
  5. ^ A New Guide to the Republican Herd. 纽约时报. 2012-08-26 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2023-05-17). 
  6. ^ Beyond Red vs. Blue: The Political Typology. 皮尤研究中心. 2014-06-26 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2022-11-04). 
  7. ^ Perry Bacon Jr. The Five Wings Of The Republican Party. FiveThirtyEight. 2019-05-27 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2023-09-23). 
  8. ^ Philip Bump. The three factions of House Republicans. 华盛顿邮报. 2021-02-05 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2021-02-09). 
  9. ^ Carl P. Leubsdorf. The GOP is divided into 3 warring factions focused on Trump: Never, Sometimes and Always. Dallas News. The Dallas Morning News英语The Dallas Morning News. 2021-02-18 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2023-01-23). 
  10. ^ Maggie Haberman. A survey of Republicans shows 5 factions have emerged after Trump’s presidency.. 纽约时报. 2021-03-12 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2023-01-28). 
  11. ^ The Republican coalition - Beyond Red Vs. Blue: The Political Typology. 皮尤研究中心. 2021-11-09 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2024-03-01). 
  12. ^ 分裂的美国:皮尤报告揭示美国公众的九大政治类型. 澎湃新闻. 2021-11-25 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2024-02-16). 
  13. ^ Adrian Blanco; Marianna Sotomayor; Hannah Dormido. Meet ‘the five families’ that wield power in McCarthy’s House majority. 华盛顿邮报. 2023-04-17 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2023-06-08). 
  14. ^ 14.0 14.1 Emily Wilkins. McCarthy Turns to ‘Five Families’ to Keep Peace Among GOP Rivals. Bloomberg Government. 2023-02-28 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2023-12-08). 
  15. ^ 15.0 15.1 Luke Broadwater. ‘5 Families’ and Factions Within Factions: Why the House G.O.P. Can’t Unite. 纽约时报. 2023-10-23 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2023-10-27). 
  16. ^ Manu Raju; Melanie Zanona. Kevin McCarthy leans on ‘five families’ as House GOP plots debt-limit tactics. CNN. 2023-02-13 [2024-02-16]. (原始内容存档于2024-03-09). 
  17. ^ Panel Study of the MAGA Movement. University of Washington. January 6, 2021 [March 24, 2024]. 
  18. ^ Gabbatt, Adam; Smith, David. 'America First 2.0': Vivek Ramaswamy pitches to be Republicans' next Trump. the Guardian. August 19, 2023 [March 24, 2024]. 
  19. ^ Ball, Molly. The GOP Wants Pure, Uncut Trumpism. The Wall Street Journal. January 23, 2024 [February 22, 2024]. (原始内容存档于January 24, 2024). 
  20. ^ Biebricher, Thomas. The Crisis of American Conservatism in Historical–Comparative Perspective. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. October 25, 2023, 65 (2): 233–259. ISSN 2075-4698. doi:10.1007/s11615-023-00501-2可免费查阅 (英语). 
  21. ^ Arhin, Kofi; Stockemer, Daniel; Normandin, Marie-Soleil. THE REPUBLICAN TRUMP VOTER: A Populist Radical Right Voter Like Any Other?. World Affairs. May 29, 2023, 186 (3). ISSN 1940-1582. doi:10.1177/0043820023117681可免费查阅 (不活跃 November 1, 2024) (英语). In this article, we first illustrate that the Republican Party, or at least the dominant wing, which supports or tolerates Donald Trump and his Make America Great Again (MAGA) agenda have become a proto-typical populist radical right-wing party (PRRP). 
  22. ^ Desiderio, Andrew; Sherman, Jake; Bresnahan, John. The end of the Old GOP. Punchbowl News. February 7, 2024 [February 8, 2024]. (原始内容存档于February 7, 2024) (美国英语). 
  23. ^ Aratani, Lauren. Republicans unveil two minimum wage bills in response to Democrats' push. The Guardian. 26 February 2021 [7 September 2021]. (原始内容存档于14 August 2021). In keeping with the party's deep division between its dominant Trumpist faction and its more traditionalist party elites, the twin responses seem aimed at appealing on one hand to its corporate-friendly allies and on the other hand to its populist rightwing base. Both have an anti-immigrant element. 
  24. ^ Campani, Giovanna; Fabelo Concepción, Sunamis; Rodriguez Soler, Angel; Sánchez Savín, Claudia. The Rise of Donald Trump Right-Wing Populism in the United States: Middle American Radicalism and Anti-Immigration Discourse. Societies. December 2022, 12 (6): 154. ISSN 2075-4698. doi:10.3390/soc12060154可免费查阅 (英语). 
  25. ^ Norris, Pippa. Measuring populism worldwide. Party Politics. November 2020, 26 (6): 697–717. ISSN 1354-0688. S2CID 216298689. doi:10.1177/1354068820927686可免费查阅 (英语). 
  26. ^ Cassidy, John. Donald Trump is Transforming the G.O.P. Into a Populist, Nativist Party. The New Yorker. February 29, 2016 [July 22, 2016]. (原始内容存档于March 4, 2016). 
  27. ^ "National conservatives" are forging a global front against liberalism需要付费订阅. The Economist (London). February 15, 2024. (原始内容存档于February 20, 2024). 
  28. ^ Zhou, Shaoqing. The origins, characteristics and trends of neo-nationalism in the 21st century. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology. December 8, 2022, 6 (1): 18. PMC 9735003可免费查阅. PMID 36532330. doi:10.1186/s41257-022-00079-4可免费查阅. On a practical level, the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union and Trump's election as the United States president are regarded as typical events of neo-nationalism. 
  29. ^ Katzenstein, Peter J. Trumpism is US. WZB | Berlin Social Science Center. 20 March 2019 [11 September 2021]. 
  30. ^ DiSalvo, Daniel. Party Factions and American Politics. National Affairs. Fall 2022 [April 11, 2023]. (原始内容存档于March 23, 2023).  参数|journal=与模板{{cite magazine}}不匹配(建议改用{{cite journal}}|magazine=) (帮助)
  31. ^ Lowndes, Joseph. Populism and race in the United States from George Wallace to Donald Trump. de la Torre, Carlos (编). Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. London & New York: Routledge. 2019. "Trumpism" section, pp. 197–200. ISBN 978-1315226446. Trump unabashedly employed the language of white supremacy and misogyny, rage and even violence at Trump rallies was like nothing seen in decades. 
  32. ^ Bennhold, Katrin. Trump Emerges as Inspiration for Germany's Far Right. The New York Times. September 7, 2020 [November 20, 2020]. (原始内容存档于November 20, 2020). 
  33. ^ Gardner, J.A.; Charles, G.U. Election Law in the American Political System. Aspen Casebook Series. Aspen Publishing. 2023: 31 [2023-12-31]. ISBN 978-1-5438-2683-8. 
  34. ^ Falk, Thomas O. Why are US Republicans pushing for aid to Israel but not Ukraine?. Al Jazeera. 2023-11-08 [2023-12-31]. 
  35. ^ Riccardi, Nicholas. Stalled US aid for Ukraine underscores GOP's shift away from confronting Russia. Associated Press. February 19, 2024 [February 28, 2024]. 
  36. ^ Lillis, Mike. GOP strained by Trump-influenced shift from Reagan on Russia. The Hill. February 28, 2024 [February 28, 2024]. (原始内容存档于February 28, 2024). Experts say a variety of factors have led to the GOP's more lenient approach to Moscow, some of which preceded Trump's arrival on the political scene ... Trump's popularity has only encouraged other Republicans to adopt a soft-gloves approach to Russia. 
  37. ^ Ball, Molly. How Trump Turned Conservatives Against Helping Ukraine. The Wall Street Journal. February 23, 2024 [February 28, 2024]. 
  38. ^ Lange, Jason. Trump's rise sparks isolationist worries abroad, but voters unfazed. Reuters. January 17, 2024 [January 17, 2024]. 
  39. ^ Swan, Jonathan; Savage, Charlie; Haberman, Maggie. Fears of a NATO Withdrawal Rise as Trump Seeks a Return to Power. New York Times. December 9, 2023 [December 10, 2023]. 
  40. ^ Baker, Peter. Favoring Foes Over Friends, Trump Threatens to Upend International Order需要付费订阅. The New York Times. February 11, 2024 [February 21, 2024]. ISSN 1553-8095 (英语). 
  41. ^ Cohn, Nate. The 6 Kinds of Republican Voters. The New York Times. August 17, 2023 [October 9, 2023]. ISSN 0362-4331. (原始内容存档于October 12, 2023) (美国英语). 
  42. ^ Collinson, Stephen. McCarthy became the latest victim of Trump's extreme GOP revolution. CNN. 2023-10-04 [2023-12-31]. 
  43. ^ Rocha, Alander. Mike Rogers says of 'far-right wing' of GOP: 'You can't get rid of them'. AL. 2023-09-07 [2023-12-31]. 
  44. ^ Macpherson, James. Far right tugs at North Dakota Republican Party. AP News. 2021-07-24 [2023-12-31]. 
  45. ^ Fringe activists threaten Georgia GOP's political future. The Times Herald. 2023-05-15 [2023-12-31]. 
  46. ^ Baker, Paula; Critchlow, Donald T. The Oxford Handbook of American Political History. Oxford University Press. 2020: 387 [April 23, 2021]. ISBN 978-0190628697. (原始内容存档于December 15, 2023) –通过Google Books. Contemporary debate is fueled on one side by immigration restrictionists, led by President Donald Trump and other elected republicans, whose rhetorical and policy assaults on undocumented Latin American immigrants, Muslim refugees, and family-based immigration energized their conservative base. 
  47. ^ Jones, Kent. Populism, Trade, and Trump's Path to Victory. Populism and Trade: The Challenge to the Global Trading System. Oxford University Press. 2021. ISBN 978-0190086350. 
  48. ^ Smith, Jordan Michael; Logis, Rich; Logis, Rich; Shephard, Alex; Shephard, Alex; Kipnis, Laura; Kipnis, Laura; Haas, Lidija; Haas, Lidija. The Neocons Are Losing. Why Aren't We Happy?. The New Republic. October 17, 2022 [May 5, 2023]. ISSN 0028-6583. (原始内容存档于May 5, 2023). 
  49. ^ Arias-Maldonado, Manuel. Sustainability in the Anthropocene: Between Extinction and Populism. Sustainability. January 2020, 12 (6): 2538. ISSN 2071-1050. doi:10.3390/su12062538可免费查阅 (英语). 
  50. ^ Spiegeleire, Stephan De; Skinner, Clarissa; Sweijs, Tim. The Rise of Populist Sovereignism: What It Is, Where It Comes From, and What It Means for International Security and Defense. The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies. 2017. ISBN 978-94-92102-59-1. 
  51. ^ Isaac, Jeffrey. Making America Great Again?. Perspectives on Politics (Cambridge University Press). November 2017, 15 (3): 625–631. doi:10.1017/S1537592717000871可免费查阅. 
  52. ^ Blum, Rachel M. & Cowburn, Mike. How Local Factions Pressure Parties: Activist Groups and Primary Contests in the Tea Party Era. British Journal of Political Science (Cambridge University Press). 2024, 54 (1): 88–109 [2023-12-31]. doi:10.1017/S0007123423000224. 
  53. ^ Johnson, Lauren R.; McCray, Deon; Ragusa, Jordan M. #NeverTrump: Why Republican members of Congress refused to support their party's nominee in the 2016 presidential election. Research & Politics. January 11, 2018, 5 (1). doi:10.1177/2053168017749383可免费查阅 (英语). 
  54. ^ Swartz, David L. Trump divide among American conservative professors. Theory & Society. 27 May 2022, 52 (5): 739–769. ISSN 1573-7853. PMC 10224651可免费查阅. PMID 37362148. doi:10.1007/s11186-023-09517-4可免费查阅 (英语). 
  55. ^ Jeffrey M. Jones. Wyoming, Mississippi, Utah Rank as Most Conservative States. 盖洛普. 2010-08-02 [2024-02-17]. 
  56. ^ Donald T. Critchlow. The Conservative Ascendancy: How the Republican Right Rose to Power in Modern America. University Press of Kansas. 2011 [2024-02-17]. ISBN 9780700617951. 
  57. ^ Joel D. Aberbach; Gillian Peele (编). Crisis of Conservatism?: The Republican Party, the Conservative Movement, and American Politics After Bush. Oxford University Press. 2011: 105. ISBN 9780199831364. 
  58. ^ Bernie Becker. Trump’s 6 populist positions. 政客. 2016-02-13 [2024-02-17]. (原始内容存档于2019-10-31). 
  59. ^ William Curtis Martin. With God on Our Side: The Rise of the Religious Right in America 2nd Edition. Broadway Books. 1996 [2024-02-17]. ISBN 9780553067491. 
  60. ^ Philip Shabecoff. Earth Rising: American Environmentalism in the 21st Century 2nd Edition. Island Press. 2000: 125 [2024-02-17]. ISBN 9781559635837. 
  61. ^ Samuel P. Hays. A History of Environmental Politics Since 1945. University of Pittsburgh Press. 2000: 119 [2024-02-17]. ISBN 9780822972242. 
  62. ^ Christopher Sellers. How Republicans came to embrace anti-environmentalism. Vox. 2017-06-07 [2024-02-17]. (原始内容存档于2017-11-02). 
  63. ^ Riley E. Dunlap; Araon M. McCright. A Widening Gap: Republican and Democratic Views on Climate Change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 2008, 50 (5): 26–35. doi:10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26-35. 
  64. ^ Sondre Båtstrand. More than Markets: A Comparative Study of Nine Conservative Parties on Climate Change. Politics & Policy. 2015-08, 43 (4): 538–561. doi:10.1111/polp.12122. 
  65. ^ 65.0 65.1 Jonathan Chait. Why Are Republicans the Only Climate-Science-Denying Party in the World?. 纽约. 2015-09-27 [2024-02-18]. (原始内容存档于2024-02-11). Of all the major conservative parties in the democratic world, the Republican Party stands alone in its denial of the legitimacy of climate science. Indeed, the Republican Party stands alone in its conviction that no national or international response to climate change is needed. To the extent that the party is divided on the issue, the gap separates candidates who openly dismiss climate science as a hoax, and those who, shying away from the political risks of blatant ignorance, instead couch their stance in the alleged impossibility of international action. 
  66. ^ 66.0 66.1 Edward Ashbee; Alex Waddan. US Republicans and the New Fusionism. 政治季刊英语The Political Quarterly. 2023-12-13. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.13341. 
  67. ^ The growing peril of national conservatism. 经济学人. 2024-02-15 [2024-02-18]. (原始内容存档于2024-02-15). 
  68. ^ The Republican Party no longer believes America is the essential nation. 经济学人. 2023-10-26 [2024-02-18]. (原始内容存档于2024-02-13). 

延伸阅读

[编辑]
  • Michael Barone; Richard E. Cohen. The Almanac of American Politics 2010. National Journal Group. 2009. ISBN 9780892341191. 
  • Peter Baker; Susan Glasser. The Divider: Trump in the White House, 2017-2021. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. 2022-09-20. ISBN 9780385546546. 
  • John David Dyche. Republican Leader: A Political Biography of Senator Mitch McConnell. ISI Books. 2009. ISBN 9781935191599. 
  • Bruce Frohnen; Jeffrey O. Nelson; Jeremy Beer (编). American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia. ISI Books. 2006. ISBN 9781932236446. 
  • Nicole Hemmer. Partisans: The Conservative Revolutionaries Who Remade American Politics in the 1990s. Basic Books. 2022-08-30. ISBN 9781541646872. 

外部链接

[编辑]